Neanderthal extinction shouldn't even be a debate

 

The Neanderthal extinction and why?

First we will look at the facts surrounding this -

When Homo-Sapiens began inhabiting the same territories as Neanderthals, two other Human like species were known to also be alive at the same time, Denisovans and Homo longi.

The arguments are homo-sapiens out competed Neanderthals for food, Homo-Sapiens killed them, bred with a few, they didn't have enough bio diversity..  and couple more questionable theories I won't even give the respect of repeating.

What we currently know;

European, Eurasian and Middle Easterner descendants of today, have 1-3% Neanderthal DNA in the genes today (white people having more).

2-5% Denisovan DNA can be found in Asiatic islands, some main land territories, Indonesia, Polynesian races, Melanesian and Australian Aborigines with Melanesian's(5% Denisovan DNA),  Papua New Guineans(4% Denisovan DNA) and  Aboriginal Australian populations(5% Denisovan DNA).

I mention this now because it's important to my theory afterwards.

Homo longi  well not enough research has been done to start tracing it's DNA, but it's DNA is found in Chinese people, just no clear indication of how much percentage.

But it's said Homo-sapiens are furthest from being related to Neanderthals, Denisovan and Homo Longi (whom are all closely Related; which makes sense , since they shared a continent for a long time before humans stepped foot on it.)

Other little facts we do know, Neanderthals and Denisovan interbred as young female was found suggesting she was the product of a Denisovan Father and a Denisovan X Neanderthal hybrid mother ( they could tell this by the amount of Neanderthals and Denisovan DNA found in her genes) which also will be detrimental to my theory.

Homo-sapiens and Neanderthals early hybrids have been found, and the more recent the hybrids get the more overwhelming human DNA cuts down the neanderthal DNA. (Starts at something like 56% Human, 44% Neanderthal in these hybrids) and quickly drops form 44% to 31%, to 18%.. which you'd think oh yeah, maybe we missed some hybrids buried.. but they managed to follow a lineage of these hybrids from Grandmother's, to daughters, to grand daughters/daughters.. and it basically was around the same percentages from other hybrids they found.

Europe, to the Americas, us White's and others not of a certain descent on Australia.. all spreading across the world.. our Homo-Sapien DNA couldn't breed out that last 3%.. wouldn't make sense if only a few Homo-sapiens bred with Neanderthals.. especially since our DNA probes overbearing in the first hybrids.

We will come back to this, need to make another point first.

So we know Denisovans bred with Neanderthals, but they also bred with Homo-sapiens.

And the Homo-sapien X Denisovan hybrids all seem to have isolated more to the islands, as well Tibet, Vietnam (I think) and a couple other mainland heavy Asiatic influenced places.. in the mainland, with more bio diversity, and probably more Homo-sapiens based on the fact of resources, the Denisovan DNA tops out about 3% maximum, that's on par with white Europeans Neanderthal genetic make up.. But when we start to follow the island nations, down to Australia (excluding Polynesian people such Maoris, Micro-Nesians, Polynesians themselves) the Denisovan DNA is at a peak of 5%.. which may mot sound like alot.. but it actually dwarves the 3% in comparison.. which I believe is due to being more isolated from European/Asian mainland's so less chance of homo sapiens breeding them down to a lower percentage.

So the fact that it seems like the Neanderthals seem to be extinct with a few amount of years, is because the Genes the Neanderthal , Denisovan and Homo Longi; females carry seem to be weaker in comparison to male Homo-sapiens DNA when passed to off-spring.

Which is like Ligers where the male Lion DNA is actually a little Stronger then female tiger's, when passed onto cubs, Tigons the Male Tiger DNA is equivalent to female lion DNA which then causes the female lions growth inhibitor gene to stop Tigons from getting massive like Ligers.. yes because the female tiger gene is weaker in the cubs the growth inhibitor gene becomes mostly dormant... Why is this important.. because Homo-sapien X Neanderthal hybrids of Female Homo-sapien X male Neanderthals have a 50/50 DNA but still suffer the broad shorter stocky build of the neanderthal.. but lack that brow ridge.. as for Denisovan female X Neanderthal male.. we haven't found the fossils of that off spring to know anything.. we barely found any Denisovan fossils, two pure Denisovans and 1 hybrid.. and the skeletal remains are far from complete anyway.

I also believe due to the injuries male Neanderthals sustained during hunting have a lot to do with why more female Neanderthals were bred with(but that can not be remotely proven so I mostly just keep that as what if theory).

But scientist seem to look past these earlier DNA hybrids of higher percentage to support the Homo-sapien caused Neanderthal extinction theory.

So in their minds their is only three logical explanations.

Homo sapiens killed them and pretty kept the females as sex slaves. And young males as slaves.

Homo sapiens out competed them in hunting, killing them by proxy and on rare occasions welcomed female Neanderthals and children into their group's.

Lack of bio-diversity caused Neanderthals to go extinct due to not having enough selection in terms of mating partners and of the few remaining females still alive of family groups, we bred with only handful and that 3% DNA is recessive and magically spread to pretty much 55% of  the world's population today, and the other 45% have Denisovan because, Denisovans existed so it is logical to their theory.

Which makes no sense as with most hybrids of animals we have today.. breed over so much they completely wipe out the other DNA.. but we're humans were special and hold that magical percentage, for hundreds of generations now.(yeah I know, sounds foolish).

Based on comparison of other hybrids, the more DNA you put into something down the generational lineage, the more it loses its other DNA, once you get to a certain percentage, you flatline at that percentage by then breeding the hybrid's together and the lower DNA won't get any higher or lower.. as seen in F1-F5 pet cats.

Meaninthe homo sapiens bred with the other 2-3 Hominids until all DNA  was at a percentage and there was only the other hybrids left to breed with.

And this is where it gets really interesting...

Aboriginal Australian people whom are branded as "half cast, due to getting lighter and lighter by generation, when having babies with people, due to no melanin throw back gene like Africans, actually end up having 2.5% Denisovan DNA,  0.5% Neanderthal DNA after the first generation of white and Aboriginal, the generation after that go down to 0.5% Denisovan, flatline at O.5% Neanderthal DNA and the generation after that have no detectable Denisovan DNA left, but still 0.5% Neanderthal DNA. 

BUT if they have a baby with a Papua New Guinea person, Solomon islands person the Denisovan DNA stays at 5%.

Then it gets weirder again, if they say have a baby with a Phillipines person whom unfortunately is one the product of what the Spanish did to the Phillipines women, and they have that strong Spanish X Phillipines DNA, the Denisovan DNA drops only to 4.5%, the Neanderthal DNA is introduced at 0.3%, but that generation has a baby with another Aboriginal half cast the DNA flat lines or maybe drops/rises by 0.05 %  at most.

And then we're still left with the unanswered question of the West African people.. that 0.5-2.5% 'Ghost lineage DNA' (i.e another Hominid we shared Africa with, but haven't found their remains). And due to the scramble for Africa with alot of ..... Unwanted  sexual relations west African women had forced upon them, the Ghost Lineage DNA is thought to have been at a flatline of 3% before Europeans did the whole scramble for Africa.

Se.parts of Africa, their is heaps of people with just Homo-sapien DNA.. no Neanderthal, Denisovan, Homo Longi or even Ghost Lineage DNA found in their genes.. And not sounding being ignorant or racist, many people would class many of them populations as 'un evolved', (I prefer to say they live within their own means and  are content with their way of life)

So I guess that long explanation is why I don't take anything that's highly debated as a fact.. When all the evidence to me suggest the simplest answer is, we really did breed the  other human like hominid species out of existing.. maybe even with a mix of out competing them.

Like their theories require alot of twisting to get them to work.

I detest Occams Razor, but honestly the simplest explanation in this case has to be the correct one.  It's got all the evidence supporting it, yet scientist want to make it this big plot story with a touch of magic, chance and were human were special.

One thing for sure is, that the interbreeding and exchange of knowledge and customs allowed is to evolve where we are today.

And scientist pushed agenda of all dogs came from wolves, after selective breeding of mutations overlook that Dire wolves were more closely related to domesticated dogs and dingoes then they are wolves.. and Dire wolves lived before wolves of today.. but yet we remake a close variant of their genes from wolves? And when they found that Clan leader buried with his dog (which was carbon dated before wolves actually existed) got cherry picked right out of today's debates... Yet when a Dingo mates with a domestic dog, its physical appearance may change, but it's genetic DNA doesn't, so it's technically not a Hybrid genetically.. so what did science do... Started a new debate that dingoes are more closely related to wolves then domestic dogs. Though the Dog X Wolf hybrids distinctly show a split..